Transportation Research Board
Home Contact Us Directory E-NewsletterFollow UsRSS
The National Academies

ACRP 04-04A [Active]

Evaluating the Airport Emergency Response Operations Simulation (AEROS) Tool

  Project Data
Funds: $290,000
Staff Responsibility: Marci A. Greenberger
Research Agency: Futron Corporation
Principal Investigator: Dave Fleet
Effective Date: 6/18/2013
Completion Date: 9/17/2014

The Airport Emergency Response Operations Simulation (AEROS), developed as part of ACRP Project 04-04, provides a training-centered suite of exercise scenarios focused on decisionmaking during airport emergency management situations. The purpose of AEROS is to provide web-based exercises for the command roles in the emergency operations center (EOC) for the FAA-required hazards (as listed in Part 139.325 scenarios). Decisionmakers receive immediate feedback both during the simulation and afterwards in a post-review. The tool provides a common environment for a range of training from initial familiarization for a novice through full team collaboration for expert-level performers. The tool can be used individually or as a facilitated exercise.
The objectives of this research are to (1) assess the overall usefulness of the AEROS simulation tool and its scenarios and (2) provide recommendations, as applicable, to ensure its effectiveness as a training tool for the airport industry. The research should include:
1. An evaluation of the AEROS simulation software compared to other simulation software tools from other industries (see Special Note B) to determine best practices that are effective in training novice through expert-level responders in their roles and responsibilities in emergency response.
2. Field evaluations and usability reviews of the AEROS tool and its scenarios to determine usefulness to airports. Evaluations of all scenarios should be conducted, be geographically diverse, include responders from each anticipated EOC role, represent Index A-E airports, and allow all participants an opportunity to provide feedback.
3. Definition of the audience(s) where the tool will provide the most value to the airport industry, including the best way to familiarize the user community(s) with the use of the tool.
The research plan should be developed so that, at a minimum, the following questions can be answered as part of the AEROS evaluation: 
·         What are the advantages and disadvantages of the scenarios, as they are developed, with respect to training EOC responders? Explain the rationale of the analysis.
·         Is there enough variability within the scenarios to keep users engaged and to optimize learning of responder roles and responsibilities?
·         Does this tool help responders better understand the necessary steps they will need to take in their role in an emergency response?
·         Is the tool user-friendly and intuitive to the novice computer user? 
·         Is this tool appropriate for all size airports as it relates to the different resources that airports have available to them in an incident? 
·         Does the fact that the simulation is unable to exactly replicate an activated EOC with respect to the noise level and chaotic atmosphere decrease the effectiveness of the tool?
·         What are the different ways in which this tool can be used (i.e, in what environment, individual, group, facilitated exercise, or classroom)?
·         What are the computer system requirements needed for the software, as developed, to function properly?
·         What are the best practices for applying the tool in the airport environment, post training record keeping, and measuring effectiveness of the training session?
·         What are the potential pitfalls that an airport should be aware of that already uses an emergency response management software system?
The final deliverables will include: a final report that documents the research, provides the findings and analysis from the evaluation and usability review of the scenarios and the tool, provides feedback and analysis of the provided questions above, outlines best practices for optimizing training for novice to expert-level responders, describes the audience(s) for the tool with recommendations as to how to best reach those audiences as to the availability of the tool, and includes recommendations on what, if any, modifications are necessary to the tool and/or the scenarios to ensure its usefulness to the airport industry. 

STATUS: The panel has reviewed the interim report.

To create a link to this page, use this URL:

Transportation Research Board. 500 Fifth St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © 2013. National Academy of Sciences. All Rights Reserved.