American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

Special Committee on Research and Innovation

 

FY2023 NCHRP PROBLEM STATEMENT OUTLINE

 

Problem Number:  2023-D-26

 

Problem Title

Update to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications

 

Background

In 2020, the AASHTO Committee on Bridges and Structures (COBS) completed a project that investigated the use and effectiveness of the current AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications (BCS).  This project included a questionnaire to each state to determine the use of the document, a review of the document contents, the development of a prioritized approach for reorganization and maintenance of the document, and the development of prioritized recommendations for re-writing of the document.  The results of the study were as follows:

 

1.    The questionnaire provided very good feedback. The number one takeaway is that the BCS is being used by many STAs on a regular basis. This justifies maintaining the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications.

2.    The COBS may want to consider converting the document to a guide specification. There has been anecdotal evidence that contractors are using the BCS as a basis for claims against STAs, since it is considered the “National Standard Specification”.

3.    Some reorganization of the sections is in order. Newer sections seem to have been simply tacked on to the end of the document. Several reorganization options were developed, each with its advantages and disadvantages. 

4.    Most sections in the document have very little commentary. The addition of commentary to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications had been a significant improvement over the original Standard Specifications. The BCS could benefit from a similar effort.

5.    Many of the sections need updating to current standards and practices and reformatting to be consistent with industry and STA specifications. Some sections require more attention than others as some have been maintained by certain technical committees since adoption of the document in the late 1990s.

6.    The questionnaire identified several potential new provisions that should be added to the specifications.

 

Literature Search Summary

There has not been a cover to cover re-write of this specification since the late 1990’s when it was converted to LRFD format.  That re-write did not include a section-by-section update and did not include the development of quality commentary text for each provision.

 

Research Objective

The purpose of this proposed research is to execute the recommendations from the first project. The goal is to bring the document up to current standards and construction practices, which will make it more useful to bridge owners.  The final products will be an updated document that can be adopted by the AASHTO Committee on Bridges and Structures. 

 

Major tasks include:

1.    Review of the final report published as part of the project completed in 2021.

2.    Review of each section and recommendations for addition/changes/deletions.  This will require researching other specifications including industry publications, international specifications, and specifications developed by member states. This may also include engaging with industry and COBS technical committees as needed.

3.    Development of draft specification language based on the research of each section.  Development of a template for the sections and consistent terminology. The format shall meet the current AASHTO formatting guidelines.

4.    Submission to the project panel for review and comment.

5.    Address panel comments and develop the final draft document for submission to the overall COBS.

6.    Address final comments from COBS and prepare the document for balloting.

7.    Address any minor last-minute comments and forward the final document to AASHTO for publishing (if accepted by COBS).

 

The first project identified that the current is useful to bridge owners.     A conversion of the document into a guide specification was recommended.  The wholesale adoption of a national construction specification is not realistic; however, a guide specification can be a useful document in the development of state specific standard construction specifications. Having a national construction specification guide specification as the basis for state specifications will help to foster uniformity of construction specification across state lines.

 

Urgency and Potential Benefits

There is a need to provide uniformity of construction practices and specification as many contractors work across state lines.  A revised AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specification document will help to improve quality, durability and uniformity of bridge construction. 

 

Implementation Considerations and Supporters

An updated AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specification can be implemented through the normal AASHTO document adoption procedures.  This will be a valuable tool for each state to update their own construction specifications. 

 

Recommended Research Funding and Research Period

The funding for this work was estimated as part of the previous study.  The values were developed based on a rough estimate of the amount of re-work required for each section.  Some sections require minor changes, other require major re-write, and others need to be written from scratch. The estimated cost for this work was set at approximately $800,000.

 

The previous project developed a prioritized rewrite schedule that addressed the most used sections first.  If funding is limited, this top priority work could be completed to remain within budget. 

 

The estimated timeframe to complete this project is 24 months.

 

Problem Statement Author(s)

Michael P. Culmo, P.E.

CHA Consulting, Inc.

Member of TRB Committee AKB20

508-864-7956

mculmo@chacompanies.com

 

Others Supporting the Problem Statement

This project is supported and endorsed by the AASHTO Technical Committee T-4 Construction. 

 

Cheryl Hersh Simmons, S.E.

Chair, AASHTO COBS Committee T-4 Construction

Chief Structural Engineer

Utah Department of Transportation

801-557-7846

cherylhersh@utah.gov

 

Carmen Swanwick, S.E.

Chair, AASHTO COBS

Project Development Director, Director of Construction

Utah Department of Transportation

801-232-7802

cswanwick@utah.gov

 

Potential Panel Members

Members of AASHTO COBS Technical Committee T-4

Other members of AASHTO Technical Committees

 

Person Submitting the Problem Statement

Cheryl Hersh Simmons, S.E.

Chair, AASHTO COBS Committee T-4 Construction

Chief Structural Engineer

Utah Department of Transportation

801-557-7846

cherylhersh@utah.gov