American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

Special Committee on Research and Innovation

 

FY2023 NCHRP PROBLEM STATEMENT TEMPLATE

 

Problem Number:  2023-C-08

 

Problem Title

Field Studies of Steel Girder Fit-up

 

Background Information and Need For Research

The fit condition of a steel I-girder bridge refers to the deflected geometry associated with a specific load condition in which the cross-frames or diaphragms are detailed to connect to the girders. With respect to vertical deflection, girders experience three conditions from inception to fabrication to completion of the bridge in place in the field: No-Load (NL), Steel Dead Load (SD), and Total Dead Load (TDL).  As such, there are three fit conditions for steel girder bridges: : No-Load Fit (NLF), Steel Dead Load Fit (SDLF), and Total Dead Load Fit (TDLF).  Consideration of the fit condition is important because the appropriate fit decision can provide significant benefit to the constructability and the overall performance of the bridge system (1). The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Article 6.7.2) specify that the fit condition of the cross-frames or diaphragms should be clearly stated in the contract documents for straight I-girder bridges with skewed supports, and horizontally curved I-girder bridges with or without skewed supports.  If the appropriate fit condition is not selected, the bridge could be subjected to problems during erection and construction.  It could also result in systems that have errors in final steel vertical profile and cross-slope or other long-term problems.

 

Past studies of steel girder fit up have been only analytical. The project will include field measurements of existing steel girder systems to determine the condition of the girders relative to the design. Researchers will compare the field results to the fit condition that the girders were fabricated to.  If necessary, current guidelines will be revised based on these field studies, and/or new guidelines on the best detailing practices impacting girder fit-up can also be established.

 

Tom Macioce of PennDOT and current Chair of AASHTO COBS Technical Committee T-14 has noted that if appropriate fit condition is not selected, the bridge could be subjected to problems during erection and construction. It could also result in systems that have errors in final steel vertical profile and cross slope, bearing performance, or other long-term problems.

 

•           How is this problem statement related to the strategic plan or research agenda of an AASHTO Committee(s) and/or Council(s)?

 

Objective

How this Proposed Research Responds

1.  Maintain and Enhance a Knowledgeable Workforce

The research findings would increase the overall knowledge of steel I-girder fit condition. It would also enhance the already analytical studies by conducting field measurements of existing bridges.

2.  Maintain and Enhance AASHTO Specifications

The research findings could be implemented into the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and/or the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications.

3.  Accelerate Bridge Delivery and Construction

With a streamlined fit condition detailing guide, designers, fabricators, and contractors will work more efficiently and consistently.  Proper fit type selection will help to eliminate project delays that occur when girders do not fit together.  

4.  Optimize Structural Systems

The research could potentially benefit steel I-girder bridges by enhancing constructability and long-term performance.

 

Literature Search Summary

The authors of this RNS document are not aware of any other similar research underway.

 

Research Objective

The objective of this research project is to investigate the condition of steel girders in the field that were originally detailed for different fit conditions and compare analytically.

•           Task 1 – Literature Review

•           Task 2 – Finite Element Analysis

•           Task 3 –Existing Bridge Selection – The research team would prepare a list of potential bridge candidates to perform the field testing on.  The research team would obtain fabrication shop drawings for each bridge selected.

•           Task 4 – Field Measurements of selected bridges

•           Task 5 – FE Model Calibration and Parametric Studies – The research team would calibrate the FE Model based on the field results from Task 4.  The research team would perform parametric studies, using finite element analysis, to investigate the different results of girder fit condition.  The team will include different girder sizes and spans, horizontal curvature, skew angle, and other design variables in their study.

•           Task 6 – Review Existing Guidelines and Develop New Guidelines – The research team will review existing guidelines (Ref 1) regarding steel bridge fit and offer revisions if necessary, or if required, develop new guidelines for choosing the best detailing method for steel girders.

•           Task 7 – Develop Specification Language – The research team would review all results and propose revisions/additions to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification if their recommendations differed from current practice.

Task 8 – Final Report – The research team would submit all research findings, guidelines, and specification language for final review.

 

Urgency and Potential Benefits

This research priority is high. The potential users of this research would be the bridge engineering and construction community.  This project will provide a foundation to base an engineer’s decision on girder-fit up and potentially have a positive impact on steel bridge constructability.  It will also provide an assessment of long-term behavior of the girders as a function of the as-built condition. This work is applicable to all DOTs, even states where concrete bridges are common.  Steel bridges are often selected for complex situations such as curved bridges and bridges with high skews.  Proper management of girder fit-up will help to eliminate problems and address common misconceptions on complex steel bridge construction.

 

Implementation Considerations

The implementation of this research can take several forms including developing a separate guideline document or adding provisions for the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design and Construction Specifications. 

 

The most logical location to implement this research results is within existing steel bridge guidelines that are published by the ASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Collaboration.  One potential document that this information could be added to is Guideline G12.1 Guidelines to Design for Constructability and Fabrication.  Using this AASHTO document, states can modify their design and construction specifications to address this issue.

 

This research would be of interest to several AASHTO COBS Technical Committees including Committee T-4 Construction and T-14 Steel Bridges.

 

Recommended Research Funding and Research Period

 

The research effort is anticipated to last 36 months.  The research effort is anticipated to cost $500,000.

 

 PROBLEM STATEMENT AUTHOR(s): For each author, provide their name, affiliation, email address and phone.

Jamie Farris, PE; Texas Dept. of Transportation; Jamie.Farris@txdot.gov

Brandon Chavel; National Steel Bridge Alliance; chavel@aisc.org

 

Potential Panel Members: For each panel member, provide their name, affiliation, email address and phone.

•           Members of T-14 and AKB20, Authors of the statement

 

Person Submitting The Problem Statement: Name, affiliation, email address and phone.

•           Jamie Farris

•           512-788-4932

•           Jamie.farris@txdot.gov

•           Affiliation (limited to):           Texas DOT