American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

Special Committee on Research and Innovation

 

FY2023 NCHRP PROBLEM STATEMENT TEMPLATE

 

Problem Number:  2023-G-31

 

Problem Title

Incorporating a methodology for planning and operational analysis of freeway facilities with ramp meeting strategy.

 

Background Information and Need For Research

Ramp metering is an efficient Active Traffic Management (ATM) strategy (Federal Highway Administration, 2020). Ramp meters are signals that control the on-ramp to freeway traffic volumes. The strategy is aimed at ameliorating the potential for traffic jams by not only regulating the on-ramp flow but also fragmenting vehicle platoons entering the freeway. This is a cost-effective solution compared to upgrading the traditional freeway's capacity. Ramp metering also offers safety benefits. The strategy is widely implemented by agencies across the nation. It was reported that ramp meters led to a rise in travel speed, a decrease in travel time, a decrease in crash experience, and a lessening of vehicular emissions in multiple large cities. They are Minneapolis/St Paul, Long Island, Portland, Denver, and Seattle (Federal Highway Administration, 2020).

The HCM 6th Edition's methodologies for freeway facilities can be used to model ramp meters; however, the lack of calibration (e.g., capacity gain at the merge points) along with practitioner-ready guidance makes it difficult to be utilized. Another significant shortcoming is the impact of ramp meters on the upstream interchange. This results in a significant bias for estimating this ATM strategy to alleviate unfavorable traffic conditions in our roadway corridors. While the types of ramp metering systems/algorithms abound, the travel time is curtailed even when accounting for on-ramp queued vehicles (Federal Highway Administration, 2020). When it comes to the use of traffic-responsive ramp meters, the travel time reliability method in the HCM should be considered to provide traffic demand fluctuations for estimating benefits. As of today, this cannot be achieved in the HCM framework. With that, multiple jurisdictions witnessed an improvement in travel time reliability as a result of implementing ramp meters. In the absence of ramp metering, the on-ramp traffic may prompt freeway mainline drivers to reduce speed or shift to the left lane to permit the entrance of the on-ramp vehicles. This reduction in the travel speed of the freeway mainline traffic may possibly give rise to clogging. With ramp meters in place, the control of the on-ramp vehicles merging onto the mainline mitigate such effects. The meters also decrease traffic occupancy, a surrogate measure of traffic density, and the time to recuperate from oversaturated conditions to undersaturated conditions. In addition, with ramp meters implemented at multiple on-ramps along a freeway facility, an area-wide strategy may be executed to enhance traffic flow efficiency throughout the facility as a whole (Federal Highway Administration, 2020). Hence, incorporating the impacts of ramp metering in the HCM's freeway facilities/reliability, as well as merge and weaving segments' chapters, is merited.

Reference

Federal Highway Administration, 2020. Ramp Metering: A Proven, Cost-Effective Operational Strategy—A Primer. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop14020/sec1.htm.

 

LITERATURE SEARCH SUMMARY

The traffic engineering literature is rich with reports and scientific peer-reviewed articles on ramp metering. In particular, the publications pertain to the operational, safety and economic benefits of implementing ramp metering systems. Following are relevant references:

 

Aghdashi, S., Davis, J., Chase, T., Cunningham, C., 2020. Modeling and Validating Traffic Responsive Ramp Metering in the Highway Capacity Manual Context. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2674 (12), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120949533.

 

Asgharzadeh, M., Kondyli, A., 2020. Effect of Geometry and Control on the Probability of Breakdown and Capacity at Freeway Merges. American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems 146 (7), 04020055. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000381.

 

Chang, G.-L., Cheng, Y., Chen, Y.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., 2020. Integration of Ramp Metering and Off-Ramp Progression. Report Number MD-20-SHA/UM/5-14. Maryland Department of Transportation, Baltimore, Maryland.

 

Cheng, Y., Chang, G.-L., 2021. Arterial-Friendly Local Ramp Metering Control Strategy. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2675 (7), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198121994581.

 

Cho, H., Chilukuri, B., Laval, J., Guin, A., Suh, W., Ko., J., 2020. Genetic Algorithm-Based Simulation Optimization of the ALINEA Ramp Metering System: A Case Study in Atlanta. Transportation Planning and Technology 43 (5), 475-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2020.1763655.

 

Cho, H., Laval, J., 2020. Combined Ramp-Metering and Variable Speed Limit System for Capacity Drop Control at Merge Bottlenecks. American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems 146 (6), 04020033. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000350.

 

Frejo, J., De Schutter, B., 2021. Logic-Based Traffic Flow Control for Ramp Metering and Variable Speed Limits—Part 1: Controller. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22 (5), 2647-2657. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.2973717.

 

Frejo, J., De Schutter, B., 2021. Logic-Based Traffic Flow Control for Ramp Metering and Variable Speed Limits—Part 2: Simulation and Comparison. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22 (5), 2658-2668. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.2973732.

 

Haule, H., Ali, M., Alluri, P., Sando, T., 2021. Evaluating the Effect of Ramp Metering on Freeway Safety Using Real-Time Traffic Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention 157, 106181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106181.

 

Heshami, S., Kattan, L., 2021. Ramp Metering Control under Stochastic Capacity in a Connected Environment: A Dynamic Bargaining Game Theory Approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 130, 103282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103282. 

 

Jacobson, L., Stribiak, J., Nelson, L., Sallman, D., 2006. Ramp Management and Control Handbook. FHWA-HOP-06-001. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

 

Kotsialos, A., 2021. A Varying Parameter Multi-Class Second-Order Macroscopic Traffic Flow Model for Coordinated Ramp Metering with Global and Local Environmental Objectives. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 128, 103106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103106. 

 

Laval, J., Xu, T., 2020. Implementation of a Variable Speed Limit/Ramp Metering Strategy to Increase Freeway Capacity at Metered On-Ramps. Report Number FHWA-GA-20-1826. Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, Georgia.

 

Ma, M., Liang, S., Zhang, H., 2020. A Dynamic Competition Control Strategy for Freeway Merging Region Balancing Individual Behaviour and Traffic Efficiency. Promet – Traffic & Transportation 32 (5), 595-609. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v32i5.3367.

 

Mauch, M., Skabardonis, A., 2021. Evaluation of Coordinated Ramp Metering (CRM) Systems in California. University of California (UC) Berkeley California Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology (PATH) Report UCB-ITS-RR-2020-02. UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California.

 

Mizuta, A., Roberts, K., Jacobsen, L., Thompson, N., 2014. Ramp Metering: A Proven, Cost-Effective Operational Strategy – A Primer. FHWA-HOP-14-020. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

 

Pang, M., Yang, M., 2020. Coordinated Control of Urban Expressway Integrating Adjacent Signalized Intersections Based on Pinning Synchronization of Complex Networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 116, 102645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102645.

 

Reinolsmann, N., Alhajyaseen, W., Bris, T., Pirdavani, A., Hussain, Q., Bris, K., 2021. Investigating the Impact of a Novel Active Gap Metering Signalization Strategy on Driver Behavior at Highway Merging Sections. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 78, 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.01.017.

 

Wang, Y., 2021. Freeway Traffic Control in Presence of Capacity Drop. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22 (3), 1497-1516. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.2971663.

 

Xu, Z., Zou, X., Oh, T., Vu, H., 2021. Studying Freeway Merging Conflicts Using Virtual Reality Technology. Journal of Safety Research 76, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.11.002.

 

Yang, G., Wang, Z., Tian, Z., Zhao, L., Xu, H., 2020. Geometric Design of Metered On-Ramps: State-of-the-Practice and Remaining Challenges. Transportation Letters 12 (9), 649-658. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2019.1677067.

 

Zhou, Y., Ozbay, K., Kachroo, P., Zuo, F., 2020. Ramp Metering for a Distant Downstream Bottleneck Using Reinforcement Learning with Value Function Approximation. Journal of Advanced Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8813467.

 

Research Objective

There is a pressing requirement to integrate ramp metering effects into the HCM's methodologies pertaining to freeway segments and freeway facilities and reliability methodologies. With ramp metering systems' operational and safety benefits, traffic flow performance measures, including the user delay costs and travel time reliability, are expected to be improved. In summary, the main objectives of this Research Needs Statement (RNS) are:

           Enable a traffic responsive method to evaluate the impact of ramp meters to demonstrate better its influence in improving the travel time reliability and user delay cost.

           With the addition of methods to measure the impact of on-ramp queue (as a result of metering) backing into an upstream intersection, we can better estimate the value of ramp meters

           The safety benefits of ramp meters will enable agencies to better decide on moving ahead with their ramp meter implementation projects

           By measuring the mobility and safety benefits of ramp meters, HCM can provide a solid foundation to estimate the benefit to cost (B/C) analysis for decision-makers.

The following tasks are proposed to accomplish the objective:

Task 1: Literature Review

Conduct an exhaustive literature review on the operational and safety benefits of the various types of ramp metering systems. This includes the various ramp metering algorithms impacts on the performance measures and how those impacts may be incorporated into the HCM's chapters (i.e., freeway facilities, reliability, merge and weaving segments, and Active Traffic and Demand Management (ATDM) chapters). Moreover, this task will document different use cases of ramp metering analyses at the planning and operation levels.

Task 2: Draft Methodology and Data Collection Plan    

Identify the required data to be collected to assess the impacts of ramp metering algorithms on traffic flow parameters. Also, elaborate on the data sources and method of assessing such impacts, whether analytically or via traffic microsimulation models. The data to be collected should include traffic conditions on the freeway merge point, ramp roadway, and upstream intersection. The plan should also propose ways to collect data in the absence of access to the field (e.g., simulation)

Task 3: Methodology Development

Propose a set of methods to:

           Enable planning level analysis of ramp meters. This includes a set of capacity (and speed) adjustment factors that can be inputted into a single segment (e.g., merger and weave) and freeway facilities analyses. These default capacity adjustment values can also be used to plan for future facilities or long-term improvement projects.

           Enable an operational level analysis to assist agencies in modeling their traffic responsive ramp meters and tune their parameters to achieve optimal operations. This operational level methodology should be incorporated into the oversaturated freeway facilities methodology to enable its use in the travel time reliability analysis.

Task 4: Data Collection and Model Validation

Collect the relevant data identified in Task 2. Evaluate the effects of ramp meters on operations via the approaches selected in Task 2. Validate the developed methodologies using field data.

Task 5: Update the HCM

Update all relevant HCM chapters and provide computational engines that perform the proposed methodologies' tasks.

 

Urgency and Potential Benefits

Substantial. This research effort will give rise to state-of-the-practice procedural methodologies for the HCM. It will overcome the shortcomings of the current HCM, which does not incorporate ramp metering effects into the freeway facilities, reliability, merge segments, and weaving segments' methodologies. Failure to fund this problem statement will result in the cost-prohibitive use of microsimulation methods.

 

Implementation Considerations

Since this effort will culminate in updated HCM methodologies, the target audience includes transportation engineering professionals and academic instructors.

 

Recommended Research Funding and Research Period

Research Funding: $500,000

Research Period: 36 months

 

Problem Statement Author(S): For each author, provide their name, affiliation, email address and phone.

Ahmed Farid, Ph.D., California Polytechnic State University, (407) 530-9360, farid@calpoly.edu

Shams Tanvir, Ph.D., California Polytechnic State University, (805) 756-2947, stanvir@calpoly.edu

Alexandra Kondyli, Ph.D., University of Kansas, (785) 864-6521, akondyli@ku.edu

Behzad Aghdashi, Ph.D., McTrans Center @ University of Florida, (352) 294 3095, saghdashi@ufl.edu 

 

Potential Panel Members: For each panel member, provide their name, affiliation, email address and phone.

 

Person Submitting The Problem Statement: Name, affiliation, email address and phone.

 

Brian G. Dunn, PE Oregon DOT, brian..dunn@odot.state.or.us, 503-507-8013

Brenton Bogard, P.E., Ohio DOT, 614-752-5575 (supporting this RNS)